To print this page properly - use Print icon located on the page.
Please note that JavaScript has to be enabled.
   
Providing Higher Continuing Legal Education and Certification Exams

OLP Product Reviews
May 2010

Review







Redact-It

By Ted Brooks


If you find yourself redacting “live text” documents, such as PDF, TIFF or even Microsoft Office files, Redact-It Desktop (by Informative Graphics Corp. http://www.redact-it.com/redactit_desktop.htm) is worth looking into. If you need to redact scanned non-OCR documents, you can also do that, but without the automated processes that make this program such a timesaver.

Installation was relatively painless, optionally adding a set of Macros which may be used with Microsoft Office document files.

Launching the program brings up a screen with web links to a few key places on the http://www.infograph.com site, including Getting Started, Feature Vote, Redact-It Site and Update. Selecting “Open” starts a browse dialog, which is initially set by default to a series of Test Files which may be used to quickly learn the features of the product. Each test file addresses an issue, which is identified in the name of the document. Each document has instructions on how to use a particular function, and has a series of searchable points which may be tested for that function. While this might sound confusing, it is actually very simple.



For instance, if we select “Drivers license number redaction sample.pdf,” we open a document that explains how Redact-It may be used to run a pre-determined script of a number of different possible ways to identify and locate a drivers license number (including various abbreviations), and then apply “Redactups” to each of them. There are a number of commonly used preset scripts, and of course, you can easily create your own.




Running the “Redact Drivers License” script brings up 65 hits on the sample document.

Once you have redacted as desired, you may then “Verify” the Redactups, assign issues to them, and “Finalize” the document, saving it as a PDF, TIFF or proprietary “CSF” file. The original document remains unchanged. The CSF format requires the use of Informative Graphics Corp.’s free “Brava!®” viewer, allowing the user to set a timer on the document, disabling it from further viewing upon reaching a pre-determined expiration date. This clever feature might be used when sending documents for review, and you want to make absolutely sure they are deleted after a reasonable review period. This feature is not available for PDF or TIFF images. Password protection is available for any saved format. Insider Tip: Don’t send the document via email, and then the password in a separate message a little while later. That’s too easy to figure out by someone looking in the email folders.

One key selling point of Redact-It is that once you save a redacted document, the text is no longer there and cannot be recovered (as it was in a certain Facebook case a few years ago).




In the event you have documents that do not have “live” text, you may either manually draw redaction boxes around an area, or for about a $50 upgrade, you may add the OCR option (Nuance OCR engine) for TIFF files, which will then allow full-text search and redaction.


Base pricing for Redact-It Desktop is $195, or $244 with OCR capability. Enterprise and Kofax versions are also available.

The bottom-line on this product is that while it has a relatively lnarrow purpose, if you have the need for automation (and who doesn't need a little help with efficiency these days), and at a reasonable price, Redact-It will likely become a valuable tool in your arsenal.




















Ted Brooks
President, Litigation-Tech, LLC
Member, Trial Technician Certification Committee, The OLP
Advisory Council, The OLP


Ted has a unique blend of education,
training, and experience in
Engineering, Marketing, Psychology,
Graphic Arts, Visual Communication,
Computer Technology, Business,
Legal Studies, and a whole lot of trial time.

He is one of the most
widely recognized figures in the Litigation Technology field, and has won the Law Technology News Award for Most Innovative Use of Technology
During a Trial.

A frequent speaker and author, Ted has written on legal technology
issues and has been featured, mentioned, and quoted in various
publications and websites. He is a regular contributor to Technolawyer,
ABA LawTech, and LitSupport Groups.

Ted has presented, trained, and
assisted in several forums, including CLE programs by NITA, ABOTA,
CACJ, LawNet, ADC, LegalTech, American Lawyer Cal Law Business
Conference, Paralegal SuperConference, Bar Associations, Government Agencies and law firms. He is also a member of The American Society of Trial Consultants, and is a Certified inData TrialDirector Trainer.

He has served on the Robert Blake murder trial defense team of M. Gerald
Schwartzbach, as well as the May-Carmen v. Wal-Mart bicycle case
defense team.

Litigation-Tech is one of only a very few firms to be referred and
recommended by both Summation and inData (TrialDirector) software
companies.

Ted’s early career moved him from engineering to computers, then on to
graphics, web design/development and marketing. Choosing to abandon
the structured life of gainful employment, he then jumped on board with an internet-based start-up company. Here, Ted held the positions of CIO and Marketing Director, developed a successful print and web marketing campaign, and set up and maintained the network hardware and
software infrastructure for the company. He also wrote client business plans and programmed an automated loan processing software
application. Without going into all of the boring details, let's just say we
all know what eventually happened to most "dot-com" star-tups.

A short time after that, Ted joined Brobeck, Phleger and Harrison in the
Litigation Support department, later to move to the Complex Litigation
Group as a Techno-Paralegal, and then becoming the Firm wide
Litigation Consultant. He designed an in-house litigation support
software solution (SuperDox), developed and taught several MCLE
courses, has written several articles, researched, tested and
recommended numerous litigation support solutions, developed client winning PowerPoint presentations and has been involved in many
extremely high-profile cases.

With Brobeck experiencing difficulties, Ted left the firm and immediately
began consulting to the firm on a very complex asbestos litigation
matter. He then started Litigation-Tech LLC; with a primary focus on Trial
Presentation and Litigation Support. Ted's in-house experience in a large
law firm affords him a perspective that is very rare in his profession. This
first-hand knowledge has proven very valuable to his clients time and
again.

He knows how to handle the stress and pressures of bet-the-company
cases, and has served on both plaintiff and defense teams with multiple
co-counsel and in-house counsel. He has extensive experience in many
types of litigation, including IP, Securities, Insurance, Products, Injury,Asbestos, Tobacco, Breast Implant, Contracts, Real Estate, Complex Litigation and High-Profile Criminal matters.

 
 

The Organization of Legal Professionals ©2010
44-489 Town Center Way Ste. D436
Palm Desert, CA 92260-2723
760-610-5462
info@theolp.org

Privacy Policy         Disclaimer